Tuesday 20 November 2012

Thank you to every one and jolly well done Tony Armstrong!


Subject: Thank you

UKIP’s Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner candidate Tony Armstrong achieved 15.3% of the Sussex PCC vote, which was an excellent result, particularly when you consider that the average of the 24 UKIP PCC candidates' share of the vote across the country was 7.3%.

The Conservatives who got 31% of the vote in Sussex, must have spent a fortune on their 250,000 manifestos. In comparison UKIP Mid Sussex only had a budget for 5,000 manifestos.

So jolly well done Tony Armstrong!

Thank you to everyone who voted for Tony Armstrong and to all the UKIP members and supporters who helped with his campaign.

Chris French
Election Agent for Tony Armstrong
Firtoft Close
Burgess Hill

Thursday 18 October 2012

Sabiha Choudhury continues UKIP's rise in Brighton

The results for the East Brighton By Election are in.

UKIP were contesting the ward for the very first time, and unfortunately resources meant we were unable to start campaigning before the postal votes went out - which accounted for a full 39% of the votes cast!

This is a very good result for us at this time. And when we are in a position to deploy resources on a similar scale to the parties that beat us, there is little doubt we will passing them as we have the Liberal Democrats.

PartyVotes%age
Labour159656%
Conservative53119%
Green45616%
UKIP1485%
Liberal Democrats592%
Trade Union Socialists552%

Turnout: 26%

Wednesday 10 October 2012

Public Meeting Report - UKIP Brighton and Hove


Public Meeting Sponsored By
UK Independence Party

Tuesday 9th October 2012



A public meeting was held in Hove last night, which was sponsored by the UK Independence Party (UKIP).


The speaker, Marta Andreasen, spoke of the hindrances faced by Britain for being in the European Union.  Amongst those hindrances were the financial setbacks (the UK is about £150 billion worse off every year for remaining in the EU), social setbacks, and the fact that it is in the European Union’s interest for the UK to remain within it, rather than vice versa.

Afterwards, Marta received a standing ovation by everyone for her clarity on the European Union and Britons’ interests.

The meeting was attended by approximately 70 people, including Sabiha Choudhury, the UKIP candidate for the East Brighton by-elections next week.

Of Marta’s speech, Ms Choudhury says, “I think Marta explained it very well.  Until Britain leaves the European Union, we have no control of our future”.

Another attendee at the meeting was Margaret, a local businesswoman.  She said, “I feel as though I’ve been blind to politics all this time.  This has really opened my eyes.  I am in favour of leaving the EU”.

Marta Andreasen is an Argentine-born Spanish accountant, employed in January 2002 by the European Commission as Chief Accountant. She’s been a Member of the European Parliament for UKIP since 2009.

Friday 5 October 2012

Autumn Newsletter - UKIP Brighton and Hove

Hove and Portslade / Brighton Pavilion / Brighton Kemptown

UK Independence Party Brighton and Hove Newsletter Autumn 2012

This Issue: Overtaking the Liberal Democrats - Stepping it up in East Sussex - Social Groups - Caring for the whole city

UK Independence Party Brighton and Hove Newsletter Autumn 2012 (PDF)

Sabiha Choudhury for East Brighton for UKIP

UKIP Brighton and Hove have chosen their candidate to fight the East Brighton By-Election.

Sabiha Choudhury has lived in Brighton  since the age of two and witnessed, first hand, the city's social and demographic changes over the years. Having raised a daughter in Brighton, she is sensitive to the needs of families and young people.

Sabiha is a professional copywriter with a background in journalism. It was while training as a journalist on a Brighton Argus-affiliated course that she developed a particularly keen interest in local issues.

If elected for East Brighton, her top priorities will be unemployment, housing, anti-social behaviour, recycling and rubbish

Sabiha Choudhury for East Brighton for UKIP (election leaflet PDF)

Publlic Meeting - Our Future and the European Union - UKIP Brighton and Hove


You are invited to a Public Meeting in Hove

OUR FUTURE AND THE EUROPEAN UNION



Speaker: Marta Andreasen MEP

Tuesday 9th October 2012 - At 7.30pm (Doors open 7.15pm).


Venue Address:
ST.LEONARD'S HALL (Aldrington), GLEBE VILLAS, HOVE, East Sussex, BN3 4ED.


Refreshments will be available.

Sponsored and Promoted by Paul Perrin and Brighton & Hove UKIP. 

UKIP and non-UKIP Guests and public ALL WELCOME!

Linda Reid,
Secretary,
Brighton & Hove UKIP.

Branch Email: info@ukipbrightonandhove.org.uk
Secretary Email: lindareid0214@hotmail.co.uk
Phone: 07881-975245.
Web: www.ukipbrightonandhove.org.uk

Saturday 14 July 2012

New constituency boundary changes spell the end of the individual identities of Hove & Portslade and Brighton Kemptown!

UKIP Brighton and Hove oppose the proposed boundary changes for Hove & Portslade, Brighton Pavilion and Brighton Kemptown.
As the traditional, historic areas in and of Brighton, Hove and Portslade are being broken up to be assimilated into a uniform, grey and bland 'Greater Brighton' (in a direct parallel to the historic countries of Europe being broken down and assimilated into the uniform, grey and bland 'European Union') Linda Reid sets out the case against the parliamentary boundary changes currently proposed by the UK's Coalition government.
Many Hove and Portslade members and residents may remember the end of Portslade Urban District Council in 1974, when Portslade became part of Hove Borough Council. Despite Portslade losing it's independent status, it's individuality and identity were generally respected by Hove Borough Council, and this identity status was traditionally preserved in the Hove Parliamentary constituency, where it has traditionally been referred to as Hove & Portslade constituency.

The next blow to local identity loss came in 1997 when Brighton and Hove (including Portslade) Borough Councils became one Unitary Authority, as the way forward for Brighton wanting City status (for which they needed Hove), and the City of Brighton & Hove came into existence officially in 2000.

This single Unitary Authority was seen by many (particularly in both Hove and Portslade) as undemocratic, especially as a joint ballot vote was held across both Brighton and Hove, so the Brighton votes and result would far out-number that of Hove & Portslade in achieving the Brighton desired "Yes" vote for uniting the towns towards city status.

Now under the Conservative led initative of the Coalition Government's reform of constituency boundaries, further loss of identity and name are destined for both Hove and Portslade constituency. Currently Brighton & Hove City includes three established Parliamentary Constituencies - Hove & Portslade, Brighton Pavilion, Brighton Kemptown - each with there own history, traditions, and identity

These proposed boundary changes would particularly effect Hove & Portslade, and Brighton Kemptown. If these Government intended boundary changes go ahead Portslade would have no mention by name and identity or be linked particularly with Hove, as has been its status and tradition.

Hove would be divided in half between two new constituencies both confusingly being named variants of Brighton and Hove - Brighton Pavilion would be renamed "Brighton Pavilion and Hove" (taking in three central former Hove wards), and Hove & Portslade would become "Brighton and Hove North" (including the rump of former Hove & Portslade, but with the addition of three huge North Brighton wards)!

The result of these boundary changes would be a further nail in the coffin of Hove and Portslade's individual identity and remaining status as a Parliamentary Constituency in their own right. The main winners locally in this new look (and artificially divided) Brighton would be the Green Party in new "Brighton Pavilion and Hove" constituency, as they would be gaining three central wards in Hove.  Three wards that they recently gained in electing more Green Councillors in the last City Council elections.

The other constituency to suffer further loss of identity with these proposed changes would be Brighton Kemptown - destined to become "Lewes and Brighton East". This constituency is already a huge area covering East Brighton and spreading from Kemptown along the coast to Saltdean and Peacehaven.

These new boundary changes would join this already sprawling constituency with Lewes, and covering the vast rural areas of Lewes, Kingston, Plumpton, Barcombe, Chailey and Wivelsfield, as well as urban Brighton City wards like Moulsecooomb and Bevendean, Woodingdean, East Brighton, and the coastal wards of Rottingdean, East Saltdean & Telscombe Cliffs, and Peacehaven.

UKIP Brighton & Hove are strongly against these proposed boundary changes in all the local constituencies, and want to protect and respect the identities and character of the existing constituencies in Brighton and Hove.

UKIP Brighton & Hove have always respected the individual identities of both Hove and Portslade, and continue to work in this constituency as such, and refer to it as "Hove & Portslade". The future of our towns and constituencies identities and status are under threat, particularly Hove and Portslade, and the future status of Brighton Kemptown is equally concerning, given the proposed joining of Kemptown with Lewes into a huge Lewes and East Brighton constituency.
.